The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution
The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution
W. Yeadon,O. Inyang,2 Authors,Craig P. Testrow
TLDR
This work presents evidence of AI generated short-form essays achieving First-Class grades on an essay writing assessment from an accredited, current university Physics module and argues that current natural language processing AI represent a significant threat to the fidelity of short- form essays as an assessment method in Physics courses.
Abstract
The latest AI language modules can produce original, high quality full short-form (300-word) Physics essays within seconds. These technologies such as ChatGPT and davinci-003 are freely available to anyone with an internet connection. In this work, we present evidence of AI generated short-form essays achieving First-Class grades on an essay writing assessment from an accredited, current university Physics module. The assessment requires students answer five open-ended questions with a short, 300-word essay each. Fifty AI answers were generated to create ten submissions that were independently marked by five separate markers. The AI generated submissions achieved an average mark of 71±2% , in strong agreement with the current module average of 71±5% . A typical AI submission would therefore most-likely be awarded a First Class, the highest classification available at UK universities. Plagiarism detection software returned a plagiarism score between 2±1 % (Grammarly) and 7±2 % (TurnitIn). We argue that these results indicate that current natural language processing AI represent a significant threat to the fidelity of short-form essays as an assessment method in Physics courses.
