Nonproportional hazards and unobserved heterogeneity in clustered survival data: When can we tell the difference?
Nonproportional hazards and unobserved heterogeneity in clustered survival data: When can we tell the difference?
T. Balan,H. Putter
TLDR
Multivariate survival data are frequently encountered in biomedical applications in the form of clustered failures (or recurrent events data) by using shared frailty models, which assume that the proportional hazards assumption holds conditional on an unobserved cluster‐specific random effect.
Abstract
Multivariate survival data are frequently encountered in biomedical applications in the form of clustered failures (or recurrent events data). A popular way of analyzing such data is by using shared frailty models, which assume that the proportional hazards assumption holds conditional on an unobserved cluster‐specific random effect. Such models are often incorporated in more complicated joint models in survival analysis.
