UPDF AI

Mitigating Lost-in-Retrieval Problems in Retrieval Augmented Multi-Hop Question Answering

Rongzhi Zhu,Xiangyu Liu,2 Authors,Wei Hu

2025 · DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.14245
Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · 8 Citations

TLDR

A progressive retrieval and rewriting method, namely ChainRAG, which sequentially handles each sub-question by completing missing key entities and retrieving relevant sentences from a sentence graph for answer generation, and demonstrates that ChainRAG consistently outperforms baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency.

Abstract

In this paper, we identify a critical problem,"lost-in-retrieval", in retrieval-augmented multi-hop question answering (QA): the key entities are missed in LLMs' sub-question decomposition."Lost-in-retrieval"significantly degrades the retrieval performance, which disrupts the reasoning chain and leads to the incorrect answers. To resolve this problem, we propose a progressive retrieval and rewriting method, namely ChainRAG, which sequentially handles each sub-question by completing missing key entities and retrieving relevant sentences from a sentence graph for answer generation. Each step in our retrieval and rewriting process builds upon the previous one, creating a seamless chain that leads to accurate retrieval and answers. Finally, all retrieved sentences and sub-question answers are integrated to generate a comprehensive answer to the original question. We evaluate ChainRAG on three multi-hop QA datasets - MuSiQue, 2Wiki, and HotpotQA - using three large language models: GPT4o-mini, Qwen2.5-72B, and GLM-4-Plus. Empirical results demonstrate that ChainRAG consistently outperforms baselines in both effectiveness and efficiency.

Cited Papers
Citing Papers