JSM Method for Automated Research Support and Trust in its Results

TLDR

The article proposes improved definitions of induction and abduction – the logical means of the JSM method of ARS, based on the principles of constructive evolutionary epistemology and the concept of empirical qualitative causality.

Abstract

The article discusses the conditions for accepting the results of JSM research. Three types of truth values are defined - correspondent, coherent and pragmatic.

Pragmatic truth values are determined through semantic types of empirical regularities. Three types of trust in JSM studies are considered: maximum, acceptable, and minimum. The quality characteristics of JSM research are also determined.

Establishment of trust is carried out in the cognitive interface module of intelligent systems (IS-JSM). IS-JSM are a constructive tool for knowledge discovery. The article proposes improved definitions of induction and abduction – the logical means of the JSM method of ARS, based on the principles of constructive evolutionary epistemology and the concept of empirical qualitative causality.