UPDF AI

Distinguishers for Skew and Linearized Reed-Solomon Codes

Felicitas Hörmann,Anna-Lena Horlemann

2026 · DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.12954
arXiv.org · 1 Citations

TLDR

It is proved that both GSRS and GLRS codes decompose into GRS subcodes and are thus efficiently distinguishable from random codes with a square code method, and the distinguishability extends to GSRS and GLRS codes with Hamming-isometric disguising.

Abstract

Generalized Reed-Solomon (GRS) and Gabidulin codes have been proposed for various code-based cryptosystems, though most such schemes without elaborate disguising techniques have been successfully attacked. Both code classes are prominent examples of the isometric families of (generalized) skew and linearized Reed-Solomon ((G)SRS and (G)LRS) codes which are obtained as evaluation codes from skew polynomials. Both GSRS and GLRS codes share the advantage of achieving the maximum possible error-decoding radius and thus promise smaller key sizes than e.g. Classic McEliece. We investigate whether these generalizations can avoid the known structural attacks on GRS and Gabidulin codes. In particular, we prove that both GSRS and GLRS codes decompose into GRS subcodes and are thus efficiently distinguishable from random codes with a square code method. This applies to all parameters for which the code length nn and its dimension kk over the field Fqm\mathbb{F}_{q^m} satisfy m+1<k<n−12(m2+3m)m + 1<k<n - \tfrac{1}{2} (m^2 + 3m). The distinguishability extends to GSRS and GLRS codes with Hamming-isometric disguising. We further relate these findings to existing distinguishers for GRS, Gabidulin, and LRS codes, and extend known results on duals of SRS and LRS codes to the generalized setting allowing nonzero column multipliers. Finally, we provide explicit transformations between GSRS and GLRS codes, clarifying the algebraic relationship between the skew and linearized frameworks.