DIGITAL BORDERS AND MIGRANT RIGHTS: THE CLASH BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND HUMANITARIAN VALUES
DIGITAL BORDERS AND MIGRANT RIGHTS: THE CLASH BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND HUMANITARIAN VALUES
Kristina Järv
2025 · DOI: 10.55843/isl2025symp269j
0 Citations
TLDR
It is argued that preserving human dignity in the age of digital borders requires a redefined balance between state security imperatives and the universal rights of migrants, anchored in both jus cogens norms and emerging digital ethics frameworks.
Abstract
The increasing integration of digital technologies into border management has fundamentally
reshaped the governance of migration, raising profound legal and ethical concerns. This articleexamines the impact of biometric control systems, artificial intelligence–driven risk analysis, andautomated decision-making tools on migrant rights within the framework of international law andhumanitarian principles. It highlights critical areas of human rights violations, including breachesof personal data security, discriminatory algorithmic profiling based on ethnicity or nationality,and the chilling effect of pervasive digital surveillance on freedom of expression. Legal conflictsarising from the application of the 1951 Refugee Convention, the European Convention on HumanRights (ECHR), and United Nations refugee protection instruments in the digital era are analyzedto demonstrate the normative gaps and enforcement challenges. Through case studies from theEuropean Union, the United States–Mexico border, and Greece, the article illustrates the tangiblehuman costs of automated pushback systems, biometric databases affecting children’s rights, andprivacy concerns linked to large-scale data sharing. The discussion emphasizes the urgent need fora hybrid governance model that combines technological efficiency with robust human rightssafeguards. Policy recommendations include the establishment of transparent and accountable AIgovernance mechanisms, mandatory human oversight in algorithmic decision-making, bindinginternational standards for data protection in migration contexts, and increased corporateresponsibility for technology providers involved in border control. Ultimately, the article arguesthat preserving human dignity in the age of digital borders requires a redefined balance betweenstate security imperatives and the universal rights of migrants, anchored in both jus cogens normsand emerging digital ethics frameworks.