Artificial Intelligence Approaches for EEG Signal Acquisition and Processing in Lower-Limb Motor Imagery: A Systematic Review
Artificial Intelligence Approaches for EEG Signal Acquisition and Processing in Lower-Limb Motor Imagery: A Systematic Review
Sonia Rocío Moreno-Castelblanco,M. Vélez-Guerrero,M. Callejas-Cuervo
TLDR
It is highlighted that advanced machine learning algorithms and multimodal fusion strategies have improved the accuracy and robustness of lower-limb motor imagery classification, pointing to a trend toward portable, low-power BCI devices optimized for fewer EEG channels.
Abstract
Highlights What are the main findings? This review highlights that advanced machine learning algorithms and multimodal fusion strategies have improved the accuracy and robustness of lower-limb motor imagery classification, pointing to a trend toward portable, low-power BCI devices optimized for fewer EEG channels. What is the implication of the main finding? These developments pave the way for clinically viable BCIs that are accessible, adaptable, and suitable for real-world neurorehabilitation contexts. Coordinated efforts are needed to create standardized, open-access datasets and protocols to accelerate translation and adoption into broader contexts. Abstract Background: Motor imagery (MI) is defined as the cognitive ability to simulate motor movements while suppressing muscular activity. The electroencephalographic (EEG) signals associated with lower limb MI have become essential in brain–computer interface (BCI) research aimed at assisting individuals with motor disabilities. Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate methodologies for acquiring and processing EEG signals within brain–computer interface (BCI) applications to accurately identify lower limb MI. Methods: A systematic search in Scopus and IEEE Xplore identified 287 records on EEG-based lower-limb MI using artificial intelligence. Following PRISMA guidelines (non-registered), 35 studies met the inclusion criteria after screening and full-text review. Results: Among the selected studies, 85% applied machine or deep learning classifiers such as SVM, CNN, and LSTM, while 65% incorporated multimodal fusion strategies, and 50% implemented decomposition algorithms. These methods improved classification accuracy, signal interpretability, and real-time application potential. Nonetheless, methodological variability and a lack of standardization persist across studies, posing barriers to clinical implementation. Conclusions: AI-based EEG analysis effectively decodes lower-limb motor imagery. Future efforts should focus on harmonizing methods, standardizing datasets, and developing portable systems to improve neurorehabilitation outcomes. This review provides a foundation for advancing MI-based BCIs.
