Programmable CBDCs, Digital Identity, ISO 20022, and AI: Reconfiguring Power in Payment Infrastructures
Programmable CBDCs, Digital Identity, ISO 20022, and AI: Reconfiguring Power in Payment Infrastructures
Dr. Sixbert Sangwa,Placide Mutabazi
TLDR
Results reveal that these intertwined technologies promise efficiency and inclusion yet simultaneously centralise control in the “rails” of the financial system, enabling transaction-level programmability and finely grained sanctions.
Abstract
Purpose: This study interrogates the convergence of programmable central-bank digital currencies (CBDCs), national digital-identity regimes, ISO 20022 data standards, and AI-driven regtech to determine how their fusion redistributes gatekeeping authority within modern payment infrastructures. Design/methodology: Through comparative content analysis of policy papers, pilot reports, and regulatory texts from the European Union, United Kingdom, China, Nigeria, and cross-border projects such as BIS mBridge, the article couples empirical evidence with three theoretical lenses—weaponised interdependence, Foucault’s governmentality, and Mann’s infrastructural power. Findings: Results reveal that these intertwined technologies promise efficiency and inclusion yet simultaneously centralise control in the “rails” of the financial system, enabling transaction-level programmability and finely grained sanctions. Liberal jurisdictions seek to diffuse power through privacy thresholds and shared governance, whereas more authoritarian models exploit identity binding and real-time surveillance to extend state reach. Limited adoption in Nigeria illustrates that technical capability alone cannot confer infrastructural authority without public trust. Originality/value: Integrating economic sociology with Christian ethical analysis, the article devises a normative test drawn from scriptural principles—honest scales (Prov 11:1), Jubilee resets (Lev 25), and freedom of conscience (Rev 13:17)—to evaluate whether emerging architectures entrench coercive leverage or foster economic justice. Practical implications: Policymakers should codify privacy by design, guarantee offline or bearer-style options for small payments, legislate transparent limits on programmability, and promote multipolar governance to avert new monopolies over “who may buy and sell.” Social implications: Embedding mercy, accountability, and pluralism at the protocol layer is essential if digital money is to enhance, rather than erode, human dignity and freedom.
