APOSTOLIC CONFLICT RESOLUTION MODEL IN ACTS 6:1–7 AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHURCH IN TARABA STATE, NIGERIA
APOSTOLIC CONFLICT RESOLUTION MODEL IN ACTS 6:1–7 AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CHURCH IN TARABA STATE, NIGERIA
KARBON PHILLIP BENJAMIN,KINISON SADDACK ALFRED
Abstract
Conflict remains an inevitable feature of both human and ecclesial relationships, yet its management determines whether communities experience fragmentation or growth. This study examines the apostolic conflict resolution model in Acts 6:1–7 and its relevance to church development in Taraba State, Nigeria, a context marked by ethnic plurality and recurring tensions in leadership representation and resource distribution. The purpose of the study is to analyse how the early Church responded to internal conflict and to assess the applicability of that model to contemporary church governance in a multi-ethnic setting. A qualitative exegetical approach was adopted, drawing on textual, linguistic, historical, and literary analysis of Acts 6:1–7. Data were sourced from biblical texts and scholarly literature, while interpretation was carried out using descriptive and thematic analysis. The study is further informed by Conflict Transformation Theory, Servant Leadership Theory, and Empowerment Theory. Findings reveal that the apostles adopted a structured conflict resolution model characterised by recognition of grievance, inclusive participation in leadership selection, delegation of responsibilities, empowerment of qualified individuals, and institutional restructuring. The study shows that this approach directly contributed to the stability and numerical growth of the early Church. It further demonstrates that the model remains relevant for addressing ethnic sensitivity, leadership imbalance, and administrative conflict in Taraba State churches. The study is significant in offering a biblically grounded framework for improving church governance, strengthening unity, and enhancing institutional trust in plural societies. It recommends inclusive leadership structures, participatory decision-making, transparent administration, and empowerment of diverse groups. It concludes that sustainable church development is inseparable from justice-oriented conflict management and participatory ecclesial leadership.
